Mound Westonka Blog


Mound Minnesota on Lake Minnetonka             
                                                             Blog.MoundWestonka.com

Dakota Rail Regional Trail

Print the article

This entry was posted on 8/8/2008 3:15 PM and is filed under uncategorized.

Recently this trail has had sections of it paved in Mound, Spring Park and Minnetrista. I think it's really transformed the areas it runs through. I've seen rollerbladers, skateboarders and cyclists using this new resource. It's ideal for biking because there really aren't any hills, and you're usually sheltered from the wind.

We are waiting for the part of the trail in Downtown Mound to be sorted out. Unfortunately, the drivers in Mound still don't seem to follow our Crosswalk rules. As I understand them, if any pedestrian or cyclist is in any part of a cross walk, all traffic must stop. What I see happening is drivers driving at 30 mph giving little thought to stopping. I can deal with this and accept it however, what about children? Are they going to be able to cross at a crosswalk safely, in Mound?

There are some drivers here and everywhere else too, that cause me to repeat almost daily to my son; "Never trust a car". "Even while in a cross walk, watch both ways and don't expect a car to stop." While I would like Mound to belong to the children, and not the reckless drivers, there isn't much I can do about it. The city could issue a few tickets, and perhaps it all ready does, and I am not saying they aren't concerned. We see the signs in the road near the crosswalks, and the police officer near Grandview during the school year, so I know there's some effort being made. Perhaps I am appealing to the reckless drivers here. Children have a different perspective, and aren't part of "driving competition" that sometimes occurs. They don't cut people off, they don't tailgate. they don't pass someone to save a minute of time, and they don't speed. They just want to get from one side of Shoreline or Commerce to the other. They don't always make decisions like we do. They need drivers to give them a break.

Also I've noticed on our newly paved trail something that has in occurred other localities as well. The trail has little stop signs for the cyclists in places. The meaning to me seems clear. Stop and proceed when safe to do so. Right next to the stop sign is a cross walk crossing the road, which implies traffic must stop for cyclists. So who has the right of way? It's confusing, even for an adult. If I had to go one way or the other, I'd say the cyclists should yield. I do understand painting a cross walk on the road probably makes things safer. I'd guess less confusing might have its own merits too. What to do? "Never trust a car."

OK, bad drivers aside, this is really an improvement to the area and the City had and has some role in accomplishing it. My son and I rode all the way out to the WRA Park last night, and it was an easy ride. The section going West of Mound is really nice and still rural. The fall colors ought to be great.

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
Trackback specific URL for this entry
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments

    • 9/2/2008 6:42 PM Ron Keagle wrote:
      I absolutely think the best policy is to never trust a car when you are a pedestrian. The worst policy is to rely on the crosswalk law, because it is full of ambiguity and widely misunderstood. The crosswalk law is not intended as a means to stop traffic so you can cross a busy street as is commonly believed. Traffic must yield to a pedestrian once they enter a crosswalk, but they must not enter a crosswalk if traffic closely approaching. Yet the law is promoted in such a way as to lead pedestrians to believe that they have the right of way over cars unconditionally. Yet the basic truth is that they have the right of way over cars only if no cars are there. So what is the point of the crosswalk law other than to falsely embolden pedestrians to risk their lives stepping into traffic because they think they have the right of way?

      Drivers are not suppose to stop for pedestrians who appear to be waiting to cross, but are not yet in the crosswalk, yet you see them doing this all the time. They believe it is an act of courtesy to pedestrians, but it is a violation of the law, and potentially places the pedestrian in the highest possible danger. This is because it is very distracting for a pedestrian to accept this personal offer of courtesy from a driver. It is indeed a kind gesture, and people are quick to respond to such kindness with an expression of gratitude, which amounts to accepting the offer of right of way from the driver and heading right into the crosswalk.

      Yet in the distraction of this personal exchange, a pedestrian is liable to accept the right of way from the courteous driver and forget to look for other cars. So the pedestrian thanks the courteous driver and then steps right out in front of a second driver who correctly does not intend to stop because no pedestrian is in the crosswalk. So all of you drivers who think you are being kind to pedestrians by stopping because you believe they want to cross had better realize that you are doing the worst possible thing for them.
      Reply to this
    Leave a comment

    Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

     Name (required)

     Email (will not be published) (required)

     Website

    Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.